🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about industry interference with public health regulations. Recently, international health experts issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of corporate influence everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, BAT suggests this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the law is enacted.

The WHO actually suggests a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for various offences “varying from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We exist in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and collect the yield and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the representative commented, adding that minors should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to accomplish desired public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, noting that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which encompasses increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.