🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are paid to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the celebration is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in Europe as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to remove Black history and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the past when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Institutions who mark it should not be comforted with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Black History is Now Month.