🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable small “sweetheart”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have been caught in a disagreement between a closed attraction, government authorities and advocacy groups.

But those most familiar with the whales say the heated discussion over their destiny often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities disallowed the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial facility near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to put them down unless the federal government funds the expense of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that demand, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Scientists say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and social skills point to they are remarkably smart creatures – something a former trainer discovered personally.

She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that entailed building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Building up those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the nuances and quirks in their characters. She cultivated a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing natures.

“Eve chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “They altered the way I view bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s relationship with the whales evolved against a context of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her three years at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which advocates say reflects the substandard environment in which they were maintained.

The park did not open to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly effects of the closure. “Structural materials is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and swim around with chunks in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not comment to a request for comment, but previously stated: “The whales … obtain far better veterinary services and 24/7 care than any individual in the UK, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was dismissed from the park in early March following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the facility believed particulars of the death were disclosed to the news outlets and she was fired shortly thereafter.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and staff members in despair. She says the park’s threat to euthanize its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” task, adding any plans to put down even a one beluga would require “immense personnel”, trucks and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She supports requests for the whales to be removed promptly from the facility, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.

In late September, the nation’s government official denied a proposal to send the whales to China.

“Granting the request would have meant a perpetual situation in enclosure and a return to public entertainment,” the minister commented. “As Canadians, we know that whales belong in the sea, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience permit an export that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reveal a wider misunderstanding of the realities of life for belugas born in captivity.

“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As officials struggle to find a solution, proposals have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Inuit communities.

A suggested refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which has received official endorsement, has proven most controversial. The planned site, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain hopeful that it could in time represent a sustainable solution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the prospect of a sanctuary reflects a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a viable approach in the near future.

Charles Vinick, head of the plan, said the facility will replicate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales get from caretakers, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|