🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, though, may align too neatly with the carefully constructed image circulated by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's pop-culture machine have collaborated to craft a tailor-made version of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a TV series released last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” the nation from chaos. Although the character's name Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this identical story instead of undercutting it. An adaptation based on a bestselling satirical novel aims to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a symptom, shifting the narrative weight to the spin doctors around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, the president is shown as having been picked by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged him to accept the role. The position was in essence a selection process with many candidates. At the centre to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the state de facto.

• The shortlist featured several politicians, among them a reformer later murdered and a security service director.
• Per an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the process stated the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by the actor's arrival as 007. His harder version prompted Russian media and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an all-powerful presence who never appears directly. He is signaled through portraits or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally validate the exact legends it perhaps aims to question.